dynamic house
if the house is 1 cm bigger in the inside,
doesn't it has to keep on growing (the outside) to catch up?
a growing house is dynamic, and therefore it's not a house,
houses are static, that's an important part of it's definition, i think.
to catch up with somthing that's bigger inside than outside, on the other hand,
is an important part of the definition of growing.
doesn't it has to keep on growing (the outside) to catch up?
a growing house is dynamic, and therefore it's not a house,
houses are static, that's an important part of it's definition, i think.
to catch up with somthing that's bigger inside than outside, on the other hand,
is an important part of the definition of growing.
posted by echochamber at 1:26 PM
2 Comments:
A space made out of spunge-material? Almost like a piece of clothing but wearable, movable, hiding things in the "walls", in the spunge...objects, fluids that get absorbed, and sound gets absorbed and...
a space that can be put anywhere and that can move when you move?
a white space with elements from the outside being inside and with projections from the inside on the outside?
Isn't that what we all do: having outsides inside us and projecting our "insides" on the outside world?
In terms of architecture or so:
isn't that a question that poses itself in archtitecture these days.
Architecture that falls under the ideology of a house,
"deleuzian architecture" that tries to deals with "the fold": the inside that always brings a doubling of the outside, the inside as the outside folded in, ...
the everlasting problem of the inside-outside-dialectics, either being a line dividing them (the wall) or either being a strategic zone that connects it (dialectical)
greg lynn is one of these architects and funny enough he describes houses in terms of a family , very ideological and therefore still competing with the ideology of a house
isn't that a struggle between architects and their materials, materiality
and then the thinkers of architecture and their metaphorical concepts
or their ideas of utopian space
and furthermore, to be avoided then by virtual space
an echo-chamber (as in echo-chambereffect) being metaphorically a house
the book being a house
dealing with nomadological spaces
camps, movable houses,
a house as a static thing is not what is being inhabited,
instead talking about houses, we can talk about inhabiting spaces, inhabiting multiple spaces at the same time,
instead of dealing with inside and outside: they're like a möbius strip, stitched together, stitching becomes a very very very important thing for that matter...
Post a Comment
<< Home